diff --git a/Socksorting/figs/graph.kra b/Socksorting/figs/graph.kra
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..fbd1366
Binary files /dev/null and b/Socksorting/figs/graph.kra differ
diff --git a/Socksorting/figs/graph.png b/Socksorting/figs/graph.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..f17b0dd
Binary files /dev/null and b/Socksorting/figs/graph.png differ
diff --git a/Socksorting/main.pdf b/Socksorting/main.pdf
index fbc910c..a5cd99c 100644
Binary files a/Socksorting/main.pdf and b/Socksorting/main.pdf differ
diff --git a/Socksorting/project.tex b/Socksorting/project.tex
index 9ddd419..193d1fa 100644
--- a/Socksorting/project.tex
+++ b/Socksorting/project.tex
@@ -155,9 +155,26 @@ on different platforms consisting of diverse hardware:\\
   \textbf{Hardware} & \textbf{Algorithm} & \textbf{Runtime [s]}\\
   \hline
   Myself & Conventional (n=20) & 352.7\\
-  
-\end{tabular}
-
+  Myself & \acronym (n=20) & 92.3\\
+  Myself & Conventional (n=100) & 42069\\
+  Myself & \acronym (n=100) & 420.69\\
+  \hline
+  My roommate & Conventional (n=10) & 91.7\\
+  My roommate & \acronym (n=10) & -2\\
+  \hline
+  Girlfriend & n.a. & n.a.
+\end{tabular}\\
+\begin{figure}[h]
+  \begin{center}
+    \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{figs/graph.png}
+    \bigskip
+    \caption{Comparative statistical time analysis of both algorithms. \acronym in blue, conventional sock sorting in green.}
+  \end{center}
+\end{figure}\\
+From the above data it is evident that \acronym bears a clear advantage in comparison
+to the conventional algorithm when it comes to sock sorting. Utilizing advanced statistical modelling we calculated a
+speedup factor of about $2.57179072584935274050327\cdot n$. The data also illustrates
+the scalability of the algorithm and its adaptability to different hardware.
 \section{Conclusion}
 
 \section{Acknowledgements}