Update on Overleaf.
This commit is contained in:
parent
1eb92d1164
commit
a58f8d8d65
3 changed files with 59 additions and 5 deletions
54
presentation/notes.md
Normal file
54
presentation/notes.md
Normal file
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,54 @@
|
|||
# Notes diffable Monte carlo RT
|
||||
|
||||
## Raytracing formula
|
||||
|
||||
- geometry term discussed later
|
||||
- Emission + All light reflected towards point
|
||||
- Yields infinite recursion -> not calculable
|
||||
|
||||
## Visualization
|
||||
|
||||
- Explain image
|
||||
- No indirect lighting!
|
||||
- Output image is what we would expect (explain shade)
|
||||
|
||||
## Differentiable rendering
|
||||
|
||||
- That function is dependent on renderer
|
||||
- Renderer needs to be differentiable
|
||||
|
||||
## Importance
|
||||
|
||||
- Inversely render complex indoor scenes
|
||||
- "Fool" neural network
|
||||
- Real time realistic shading in AR
|
||||
- Application in maritime research
|
||||
|
||||
## Adversarial image generation
|
||||
|
||||
- Example for classification on slide 2!
|
||||
- Fool neural netweork into wrongly classifying input data
|
||||
- Optimize Image into wrong class
|
||||
|
||||
## Why differentiable rendering is hard
|
||||
|
||||
- Example later
|
||||
- geometry term explanation later
|
||||
|
||||
## Former methods visualization
|
||||
|
||||
- Plane lit by a point light source.
|
||||
- gradient with respect to the plane moving right
|
||||
- light source remains static => the gradient should only be $\ne 0$ at the boundaries
|
||||
- OpenDR and Neural not able to correctly calculate the gradients
|
||||
- they are based on color buffer differences
|
||||
|
||||
## Edge sampling
|
||||
|
||||
- Approximate point lights using small area lights
|
||||
- Specular => angle of incidence = angle of light reflected
|
||||
- only lambertian materials
|
||||
|
||||
## Inverse Rendering - Results in this paper
|
||||
|
||||
- ADAM: talk by Mr. Wu
|
||||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue