discussion and results
This commit is contained in:
parent
e5a5757b38
commit
d512be9332
4 changed files with 20 additions and 3 deletions
|
|
@ -155,9 +155,26 @@ on different platforms consisting of diverse hardware:\\
|
|||
\textbf{Hardware} & \textbf{Algorithm} & \textbf{Runtime [s]}\\
|
||||
\hline
|
||||
Myself & Conventional (n=20) & 352.7\\
|
||||
|
||||
\end{tabular}
|
||||
|
||||
Myself & \acronym (n=20) & 92.3\\
|
||||
Myself & Conventional (n=100) & 42069\\
|
||||
Myself & \acronym (n=100) & 420.69\\
|
||||
\hline
|
||||
My roommate & Conventional (n=10) & 91.7\\
|
||||
My roommate & \acronym (n=10) & -2\\
|
||||
\hline
|
||||
Girlfriend & n.a. & n.a.
|
||||
\end{tabular}\\
|
||||
\begin{figure}[h]
|
||||
\begin{center}
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{figs/graph.png}
|
||||
\bigskip
|
||||
\caption{Comparative statistical time analysis of both algorithms. \acronym in blue, conventional sock sorting in green.}
|
||||
\end{center}
|
||||
\end{figure}\\
|
||||
From the above data it is evident that \acronym bears a clear advantage in comparison
|
||||
to the conventional algorithm when it comes to sock sorting. Utilizing advanced statistical modelling we calculated a
|
||||
speedup factor of about $2.57179072584935274050327\cdot n$. The data also illustrates
|
||||
the scalability of the algorithm and its adaptability to different hardware.
|
||||
\section{Conclusion}
|
||||
|
||||
\section{Acknowledgements}
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue